Beware overconfident advice

An excellent post from Orgtheory.net:

From The New Scientist, some research showing that people prefer cockiness to expertise:

The research, by Don Moore of Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, shows that we prefer advice from a confident source, even to the point that we are willing to forgive a poor track record. Moore argues that in competitive situations, this can drive those offering advice to increasingly exaggerate how sure they are.

But this is pretty dangerous! Orgtheory.net also reminds us of:

(…)a famous paper by Kruger and Sunning showed, people who are bad at what they do are generally also incapable of understanding that they suck — and this directly contributes to inflated self-perception. So, incompetence tends to make people cocky and people prefer cocky judgements over demonstrated expertise, which is pretty much the worst of both worlds.

And this is Krueger and Sunning famous paper:

Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments.

Justin Kruger and David Dunning / Cornell University

People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd. Several analyses linked this miscalibration to deficits in metacognitive skill, or the capacity to distinguish accuracy from error. Paradoxically, improving the skills of participants, and thus increasing their metacognitive competence, helped them recognize the limitations of their abilities.

Elección 2009: Género y Representación Proporcional

Estos son los resultados de la elección federal 2009 para el PAN, PRI y PRD, por el principio de representación proporcional. 

Diputados Federales por Representación Proporcional 2009
  Candidatos Ganadores
Partido Político Hombres Mujeres Total Hombres Mujeres Total
PAN 106 94 200 42 31 73
  53 47 100% 57.53 42.47 100%
PRD 95 105 200 15 17 32
  47.5 52.5 100 46.88 53.13 100%
PRI 100 100 200 31 22 53
  50 50 100 58.49 41.51 100%
PVEM 112 88 200 10 8 18
  56 44 100 55.56 44.44 100%
PANAL 100 100 200 5 3 8
  50 50 100 62.5 37.5 100%
PSD 100 100 200
  50 50 100
CONV 85 82 167 3 3 6
  50.9 49.1 100 50 50 100%
PT 107 93 200 6 4 10
  53.5 46.5 100 60 40 100%
Total 805 762 1,567 112 88 200
  51.37 48.63 100% 56 44 100%
Cálculos propios con base en datos del IFE.        

Y ésta es la gráfica por circunscripción para el PAN, PRI y PRD:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nota: Estos resultados forman parte del proyecto de investigación (en proceso): “Evaluación de la perspectiva de género en plataformas de partidos políticos, candidaturas y cargos de elección 2009“, financiado por el Instituto Nacional de las Mujeres.